Explosion
Some Asexuals Are Using AI Companions for Intimacy Without Sex
Technology

Some Asexuals Are Using AI Companions for Intimacy Without Sex

Maya TorresBy Maya Torres·

More asexual individuals are using AI companion apps to fulfill emotional and occasionally sensual intimacy needs — without the sexual expectations tied to human relationships, as highlighted in a recent report from Wired.

What’s Actually Happening Here

Asexuality is a sexual orientation where someone feels little or no sexual attraction to others. It exists along a spectrum. Some asexual people still feel romantic attraction, emotional closeness, or even enjoy sensual touch; they just don’t connect those feelings to sex like most people do.

This creates a unique challenge in today’s world of dating apps and hookup culture. Finding a deep emotional connection without the weight of sexual expectations can be tough. Some asexual users believe AI companions, like Replika or Character.AI, where you build a relationship with a chatbot, help bridge that gap that human relationships often miss.

One artist interviewed by Wired shared their experience using roleplay with a chatbot to explore a kind of intimacy that’s hard to categorize. “I’ve got one hand on the keyboard, one hand down below,” they explained, showing how personal and diverse these interactions can be. For some, the appeal isn’t sexual at all. It’s about feeling heard, understood, and emotionally close to something that demands nothing in return.

Why AI Works For This Use Case

AI companions act as endlessly patient conversational partners. They don’t pressure users into physical relationships. They don’t get frustrated if someone lacks sexual interest. For those who’ve navigated a world that treats sex as a standard expectation in romantic relationships, this patience is invaluable.

Think of it this way: most dating scripts assume there’s a destination. AI companions don’t have a destination. They simply keep the conversation going. For asexual users seeking emotional depth without an implied endpoint, this format fits remarkably well.

The apps have adapted to support this approach. Replika, one of the leading AI companion platforms, allows users to define the type of relationship they want with their AI, whether that’s friendship, romance, or mentorship. Users can also shape their companion’s personality, communication style, and emotional tone over time.

Not Everyone In the Asexual Community Is On Board

The Wired report mentions that some asexual advocates feel uneasy about this association. Their concern revolves around a familiar issue: that mainstream narratives might oversimplify asexuality as just a workaround, suggesting that asexual people prefer robots over humans or that AI fills some kind of void. This perspective, they argue, misses the essence of what asexuality really is.

This pushback is understandable. Asexual people have long faced their orientation being viewed as a problem to fix rather than a legitimate identity. Framing AI companionship as a “solution” for asexuals risks reinforcing that notion, even if users are engaging with these tools intentionally and on their own terms.

What This Means

For many, this story reveals how AI companion technology is finding genuinely meaningful applications that its creators likely never anticipated. These tools were designed broadly, but users are adapting them to meet specific emotional and social needs.

For asexual users, the key takeaway is more personal: AI companions provide a kind of low-pressure intimacy that’s hard to find elsewhere. Whether that’s healthy, sustainable, or ideal is something each person has to determine for themselves. However, the fact that people are deriving real value from these tools — not as replacements for human connection but as supplements — speaks volumes about how AI is integrating into everyday life.

This also raises a bigger question for everyone: as AI companions become more advanced, what defines a meaningful relationship, and who gets to decide?

By The Numbers: AI Companion Apps
Data Point Figure
Replika registered users (as of 2023) 10 million+
Estimated share of population identifying as asexual ~1%
Character.AI monthly active users (2024 peak) ~20 million

What the Community Is Saying

“As an ace person this actually makes a lot of sense to me. The pressure just disappears. You can have deep emotional conversations without it always steering somewhere you don’t want to go.”

— Reddit user u/velvetarrow99, r/asexuality

“I get why people do this but I also worry we’re going to see ‘just use a robot’ become the new ‘have you tried therapy’ response to asexuality online.”

— YouTube commenter on Wired’s coverage, @quietspectrumlife

What To Watch

  • Regulation of AI companion apps: Several countries are actively discussing how to govern AI relationships, especially regarding emotional dependency and data privacy. New regulations could reshape how these platforms function within the next 12 to 18 months.
  • Platform policy shifts: Replika significantly restricted its romantic and intimate features in early 2023 before partially reversing its stance. Similar changes at other apps might impact users who’ve developed ongoing relationships with their companions.
  • Research on outcomes: Academic studies on AI companion use within specific communities like asexual users are still emerging. Expect more peer-reviewed research on psychological outcomes, both positive and negative, to surface in 2025 and 2026.
  • Community response: How asexual advocacy groups react to growing media attention on this topic will influence the broader public discussion about AI and non-traditional relationship structures.

Sources: Wired

Maya Torres

Maya Torres

Maya Torres is the Consumer Tech Editor at Explosion.com with 7 years covering product launches for major technology publications. She has reviewed over 300 devices across smartphones, laptops, wearables, and smart home products. Maya specializes in translating spec sheets into real-world buying advice and attends CES, MWC, and Apple keynotes as press. Her reviews focus on helping readers decide what to buy, not just what specs look good on paper.