Money changes shape every few generations. From seashells to gold coins to paper currency to digital banking, each evolution rewrites financial possibilities and limitations. Now cryptocurrency—particularly Bitcoin—represents another potential transformation, one that captured Dr. Tony Jacob’s attention and refuses to let go.
“I think Bitcoin will become the world currency in 20 years. That’s something people fight me on,” he revealed.
His conviction about Bitcoin’s future runs deeper than mere speculation. Unlike many who approach cryptocurrency with short-term trading mindsets, Tony perceives fundamental shifts in how value might transfer across borders, store across time, and resist manipulation from centralized authorities.
Let’s examine what actually converted a successful healthcare entrepreneur into a passionate Bitcoin advocate.
Money Printing Made Him Question Everything
Watching central banks create trillions from thin air would make anyone reconsider conventional financial wisdom. Dr. Tony Jacob witnessed unprecedented monetary expansion and drew troubling conclusions about its long-term consequences.
“You have 40% of the money in circulation right now that was printed within the last year and a half to two years, so let’s call it two years. So we’ve printed 40% of our money out of thin air in two years, so we basically doubled our monetary supply,” he observed during “The Lifestyle Investor” podcast.
Most people barely noticed this dramatic expansion of money supply. Daily life continued, prices rose gradually rather than overnight, and financial markets reached new heights. Yet Tony recognized something profound happening beneath the surface—a massive wealth transfer mechanism operating through currency devaluation.
“So the value of the dollar is decreasing. You have a devalued dollar, it goes down every single day. You’ve got inflation at the highest rate that it’s ever been at,” he continued.
Hard Money Principles Resonated Deeply
Money requires trust. When that trust erodes through inflation, seizure, or restriction, people naturally seek alternatives. Throughout history, humans have gravitated toward “hard money”—forms of value with inherent scarcity and resistance to debasement.
Dr. Tony Jacob connected Bitcoin with these historical hard money principles, seeing the cryptocurrency as a technological evolution of gold’s monetary properties.
“I think looking at crypto from a philosophical standpoint, I think it’s the way that humanity is probably going to head towards because it’s simply better money. And I think ultimately, and again, philosophically, I think it’s better for the entire planet. I think it’s better for all of us to be in charge and stewards of our own money,” he explained.
His analysis extends beyond inflation hedging toward fundamental questions about monetary sovereignty—who should control money creation and under what constraints? Bitcoin’s programmatic issuance schedule and mathematical rules appealed to Tony’s desire for predictable monetary policy immune from political manipulation.
“For some people that’s precious metals. Other folks, it’s real estate and other folks, it’s cryptocurrency. And I do like the properties of where Bitcoin is headed. I think it’s really sound money, it’s inflation resistant or will become inflation resistant. It’s easy to transmit,” he elaborated.
These reflections reveal Tony’s interest stems from monetary philosophy rather than speculation. While many crypto enthusiasts focus on price movements and trading opportunities, Tony evaluates Bitcoin through a monetary evolution lens—seeing it as potentially superior technology for transferring and storing value.
Early Adopter Parallels Were Unmistakable
Technology adoption follows recognizable patterns. Early internet investors who recognized transformative potential before mainstream adoption created extraordinary wealth. Dr. Tony Jacob saw similar adoption dynamics emerging with Bitcoin and positioned accordingly.
“Considering the current technological adoption trajectory, I believe we are in the early stages of a transformative phase. With institutional investment entering the market, the present moment parallels the nascent internet era of 1998-1999. The long-term implications for human technological engagement remain to be fully understood,” he shared.
Many investors struggle to evaluate technology during its awkward adolescent phase—after proving basic viability but before achieving polished user experiences and mainstream acceptance. Tony recognized this uncomfortable middle period often presents the greatest investment opportunity, despite appearing risky to conventional analysis.
His long-term perspective allows him to weather volatility that would shake out shorter-term market participants. Rather than focusing on daily price movements, Tony evaluates against potential future adoption scenarios playing out over decades.
0 Comments